Odd label-not standard-not odd for the time period guess UK
Nose: light port nose
Body-full
Taste: tannic-fruit lesser
Aftertaste: tannic-brandy
17/20
I may be hard on this one-will report tomorrow.
Graham's 1963
Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil
-
John Vachon
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:25 am
- Location: Stow, ohio, USA
Re: Graham's 1963
Hour in both nose amd aftertaste improved-18/20.
-
Moses Botbol
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
- Location: Boston, USA
Re: Graham's 1963
Oh, how I love this Port!
Always great and has a solid future still ahead of it.
Always great and has a solid future still ahead of it.
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
-
John Vachon
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:25 am
- Location: Stow, ohio, USA
Re: Graham's 1963
2nd day- Nose lesser-body very tannic & brandy filled-I like this profile but most would not.
I would give it a 18-18+/20.
I would give it a 18-18+/20.
Re: Graham's 1963
Why do you think that most would not, John?
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
-
John Vachon
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:25 am
- Location: Stow, ohio, USA
Re: Graham's 1963
The comments I get on this type of old port from friends is about the tannin and the brandy showing. They
want it smooth and balanced but I like port with grip.
want it smooth and balanced but I like port with grip.