1985 Quinta do Noval Nacional Vintage Port

This forum is for users to post their Port tasting notes.

Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil

Post Reply
Eric Menchen
Posts: 6335
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:48 pm
Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States of America - USA

1985 Quinta do Noval Nacional Vintage Port

Post by Eric Menchen »

Tasted blind. Medium ruby red with a slight brown tint. This is, however, the most brown of the flight (1985 Rabello Valente, Krohn, Kopke, QdNN, and Croft). This has even deeper berry aromas than the first three wines of the flight, with more of the blackberry, zwarte currant type. There is also some faint lemon, and possible VA. No, not really VA. There is some fig aroma, almost more fresh than dried, and faint grape stem. In the mouth, there are some tannins, and a decent amount, really a lot of acid. The fig comes through in the flavor, but not is much more of the dried fig filling character. This is more oxidized than the first three wines, but still quite tasty. There is some warmth in the finish. And later I detected a buttery Indonesian cinnamon roll character. 92-93 points, I’ll settle on 92+. (It slightly edges out the next wine tasted, a 1985 Croft which I also scored at 92.)
User avatar
Al B.
Posts: 6022
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 1:06 am
Location: Wokingham, United Kingdom - UK

Re: 1985 Quinta do Noval Nacional Vintage Port

Post by Al B. »

Since this was the same bottle as the note posted by Glenn, should the notes not be combined into the same thread? The same is true for all the other notes people have posted as different threads for the same bottle?
User avatar
Andy Velebil
Posts: 16626
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 1985 Quinta do Noval Nacional Vintage Port

Post by Andy Velebil »

Al B. wrote:Since this was the same bottle as the note posted by Glenn, should the notes not be combined into the same thread? The same is true for all the other notes people have posted as different threads for the same bottle?
No, as this way they appear as different TN's in the searchable Database.
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Mike Meehan
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 2:42 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: 1985 Quinta do Noval Nacional Vintage Port

Post by Mike Meehan »

Andy Velebil wrote:
Al B. wrote:Since this was the same bottle as the note posted by Glenn, should the notes not be combined into the same thread? The same is true for all the other notes people have posted as different threads for the same bottle?
No, as this way they appear as different TN's in the searchable Database.
Is that a good thing? If 10 people taste the same bottle and all post positive separate tasting notes, and I come along later and read them, I see 10 great write-ups for a port and think this must be a nicely consistent and great port. All based on a single bottle (but I can't tell that)...
User avatar
Glenn E.
Posts: 8172
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:49 am
Location: Sammamish, Washington, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 1985 Quinta do Noval Nacional Vintage Port

Post by Glenn E. »

Mike Meehan wrote:
Andy Velebil wrote:
Al B. wrote:Since this was the same bottle as the note posted by Glenn, should the notes not be combined into the same thread? The same is true for all the other notes people have posted as different threads for the same bottle?
No, as this way they appear as different TN's in the searchable Database.
Is that a good thing? If 10 people taste the same bottle and all post positive separate tasting notes, and I come along later and read them, I see 10 great write-ups for a port and think this must be a nicely consistent and great port. All based on a single bottle (but I can't tell that)...
Provided the taster has filled in the Tasting Date, you would at least have that clue to work with.

Keeping them all separate also allows you to seach for a given tasting note by a particular person on a particular date. This is useful in general, but also has the side effect of allowing us to provide you with that handy "My Tasting Notes" link so you can look back through your own history if you want to.
Glenn Elliott
User avatar
Andy Velebil
Posts: 16626
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 1985 Quinta do Noval Nacional Vintage Port

Post by Andy Velebil »

Glenn E. wrote:
Mike Meehan wrote:
Andy Velebil wrote:No, as this way they appear as different TN's in the searchable Database.
Is that a good thing? If 10 people taste the same bottle and all post positive separate tasting notes, and I come along later and read them, I see 10 great write-ups for a port and think this must be a nicely consistent and great port. All based on a single bottle (but I can't tell that)...
Provided the taster has filled in the Tasting Date, you would at least have that clue to work with.

Keeping them all separate also allows you to seach for a given tasting note by a particular person on a particular date. This is useful in general, but also has the side effect of allowing us to provide you with that handy "My Tasting Notes" link so you can look back through your own history if you want to.
+1
And no way is going to be perfect. We've found this way tends to work the best more often than not.
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Mike Meehan
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 2:42 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: 1985 Quinta do Noval Nacional Vintage Port

Post by Mike Meehan »

Glenn E. wrote:...also has the side effect of allowing us to provide you with that handy "My Tasting Notes" link so you can look back through your own history if you want to.
Ah, that is an angle I wasn't aware of. Very handy.
Post Reply