1985 Fonseca Vintage Port
Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil
1985 Fonseca Vintage Port
Opened early on New Years Eve. Very dark, cork came out in two attempts. After 7 hour decant , we both noticed right a way an astringency not in a pleasant way. VA of some kind and just enough to ruin what would have been a great bottle. Even after three days it's there waiting on the front end enough to evoke a "yuck". NR
-
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
- Location: Boston, USA
Re: 1985 Fonseca
Wow, sorry to read. 1985 Fonseca is one if the not the best vintage of the whole decade (would be a good topic discussion). This wine is still an infant, but should've been rocking a lot more than you describe.
Is it from a case you have or a standalone bottle?
Is it from a case you have or a standalone bottle?
Welsh Corgis | F1 |British Cars
Re: 1985 Fonseca
It was 1 of 2 bottles from a Winebid auction. I knew it was a bit soon for this wine but I wanted to see if I wanted to add more while it is still reasonably priced and available.
- Andy Velebil
- Posts: 16624
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
- Contact:
Re: 1985 Fonseca
I've not seen or heard of any bottle variation of this Port as you describe. I would assume it was most likely heat damaged at some point during its life.
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
-
- Posts: 6334
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:48 pm
- Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States of America - USA
Re: 1985 Fonseca
As I recall, at our 1985 horizontal in Seattle we had two bottles of 1985 Fonseca. One opened the first day was good but not great. Given its relatively disappointing showing (compared to expectations), Roy threw in a second bottle that was indeed great.Andy Velebil wrote:I've not seen or heard of any bottle variation of this Port as you describe. I would assume it was most likely heat damaged at some point during its life.
- Andy Velebil
- Posts: 16624
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
- Contact:
Re: 1985 Fonseca
There is some bottle variation with some bottles being very closed and some more open at the moment, a phase it appears to be in. But that isn't anything like what was experienced with this bottle.Eric Menchen wrote:As I recall, at our 1985 horizontal in Seattle we had two bottles of 1985 Fonseca. One opened the first day was good but not great. Given its relatively disappointing showing (compared to expectations), Roy threw in a second bottle that was indeed great.Andy Velebil wrote:I've not seen or heard of any bottle variation of this Port as you describe. I would assume it was most likely heat damaged at some point during its life.
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
-
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
- Location: Boston, USA
Re: 1985 Fonseca
Every time I have had this vintage, it's been outstanding, albeit very young still.
Welsh Corgis | F1 |British Cars
Re: 1985 Fonseca
I don't have the same experience with VP as many here, which leads to some difficulty in deciding exactly what is going on. In the past, with mostly California Cabs, I didn't see many "corked" wines or have the variances of ~30 year old bottles. In fact it was this same night I opened my 1979 Heitz Martha's Vineyards. The Fonseca, if it had been a good showing could have been WOTN but even on it's long smooth slide downhill the '79 was the best cab I've had in years (not saying much). So what I had hoped was bottle stink, never blew off and is still present in what is left. I hate to pour it out..but yuck. Needless to say, from what I did see, I'm going to get more.
-
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
- Location: Boston, USA
Re: 1985 Fonseca
That must've been a fun wine. I like the style of CA cabs back then more than I do now. Do you own more of that vintage?Edward J wrote: In fact it was this same night I opened my 1979 Heitz Martha's Vineyards. The Fonseca, if it had been a good showing could have been WOTN but even on it's long smooth slide downhill the '79 was the best cab I've had in years (not saying much).
Welsh Corgis | F1 |British Cars
- Andy Velebil
- Posts: 16624
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
- Contact:
Re: 1985 Fonseca
Cool wineMoses Botbol wrote:That must've been a fun wine. I like the style of CA cabs back then more than I do now. Do you own more of that vintage?Edward J wrote: In fact it was this same night I opened my 1979 Heitz Martha's Vineyards. The Fonseca, if it had been a good showing could have been WOTN but even on it's long smooth slide downhill the '79 was the best cab I've had in years (not saying much).
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Re: 1985 Fonseca
I did and we enjoyed them. The '79 certainly wasn't the '74 or '76 in my recollection. After about '83 we decided to drink out the cellar and focus on our growing family. I recently raided what was left of my Dad's cellar and found a stash of old cabs I'd forgotten about. I'm not a big fan of todays young huge "drink it now" cab, but I also have no idea of these "cult" wines that are off the charts expensive.Moses Botbol wrote:
That must've been a fun wine. I like the style of CA cabs back then more than I do now. Do you own more of that vintage?
-
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
- Location: Boston, USA
Re: 1985 Fonseca
I haven't had much if any of the modern CA cult wines. If they are like a modern Caymus, I'd pass. I bought a bottle of Caymus at Costco for a friend's birthday party once and felt embarrassed when I tasted it. Everyone else liked it, but to me it was like raspberry cheesecake. And not in a good way.... Had a bottle of '80 Caymus that was solid though...Edward J wrote:I did and I'm not a big fan of todays young huge "drink it now" cab, but I also have no idea of these "cult" wines that are off the charts expensive.Moses Botbol wrote:
That must've been a fun wine. I like the style of CA cabs back then more than I do now. Do you own more of that vintage?
I buy Diamond Creek's whenever I see them at auction for reasonable prices.
If you come to Boston, I will open an '85 Fonseca for you that is from a perfectly cellared case.
Welsh Corgis | F1 |British Cars
- Glenn E.
- Posts: 8169
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:49 am
- Location: Sammamish, Washington, United States of America - USA
- Contact:
Re: 1985 Fonseca
Sad. These are pretty reliably stellar bottles, so I suspect this bottle was heat damaged at some point in its lifetime. It's possible it just wasn't a clean bottle when it was bottled, too.Edward J wrote:Opened early on New Years Eve. Very dark, cork came out in two attempts. After 7 hour decant , we both noticed right a way an astringency not in a pleasant way. VA of some kind and just enough to ruin what would have been a great bottle. Even after three days it's there waiting on the front end enough to evoke a "yuck". NR
Stock up on these - they're lifers. Meaning you'll be able to drink them for the rest of your life.
Glenn Elliott
Re: 1985 Fonseca
Would you believe it, I knew I had one bottle of Caymus from my stash left, I just checked a 1980. A bit bin soiled, but top shoulder fill. Probably should drink it up . As for the perfect cellaring of old Ports, Blanche DuBois said, "I have always depended on the kindness of strangers."Moses Botbol wrote:I haven't had much if any of the modern CA cult wines. If they are like a modern Caymus, I'd pass. I bought a bottle of Caymus at Costco for a friend's birthday party once and felt embarrassed when I tasted it. Everyone else liked it, but to me it was like raspberry cheesecake. And not in a good way.... Had a bottle of '80 Caymus that was solid though...Edward J wrote:I did and I'm not a big fan of todays young huge "drink it now" cab, but I also have no idea of these "cult" wines that are off the charts expensive.Moses Botbol wrote:
That must've been a fun wine. I like the style of CA cabs back then more than I do now. Do you own more of that vintage?
I buy Diamond Creek's whenever I see them at auction for reasonable prices.
If you come to Boston, I will open an '85 Fonseca for you that is from a perfectly cellared case.
Re: 1985 Fonseca
I wonder if the 1985 Fonseca was just plain "corked" and what was experienced was TCA?
Anyway, Moses, I wrote an entire article about what I believe are the two best Ports of the decade (1980s) the '85 Fonseca and 1987 Vargellas. I am sure you can find it.
Anyway, Moses, I wrote an entire article about what I believe are the two best Ports of the decade (1980s) the '85 Fonseca and 1987 Vargellas. I am sure you can find it.
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
-
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
- Location: Boston, USA
Re: 1985 Fonseca
I can't recall ever having '87 Vargellas or seeing it for sale... Not that I have been looking for that vintage, but maybe I should! Thanks.Roy Hersh wrote:Anyway, Moses, I wrote an entire article about what I believe are the two best Ports of the decade (1980s) the '85 Fonseca and 1987 Vargellas.
Welsh Corgis | F1 |British Cars
Re: 1985 Fonseca
Not corked in any way I could tell and I'm more sensitive to it. This was a metallic front end, everything else was clean and didn't seem cooked either. It could just be that this Winebid bottle was improperly stored somehow before I got it.Roy Hersh wrote:I wonder if the 1985 Fonseca was just plain "corked" and what was experienced was TCA?
- Glenn E.
- Posts: 8169
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:49 am
- Location: Sammamish, Washington, United States of America - USA
- Contact:
Re: 1985 Fonseca
They're really hard to find. I've done some searching (anniversary year) and have never had any luck.Moses Botbol wrote:I can't recall ever having '87 Vargellas or seeing it for sale... Not that I have been looking for that vintage, but maybe I should! Thanks.Roy Hersh wrote:Anyway, Moses, I wrote an entire article about what I believe are the two best Ports of the decade (1980s) the '85 Fonseca and 1987 Vargellas.
1987 Malvedos is also superb, and I managed to acquire a case of that. I also got a case of Porto Souza during the buying opportunity, so I'm set for a couple more decades.
Glenn Elliott
-
- Posts: 1443
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:19 am
- Location: Texas, USA
Re: 1985 Fonseca
The '87s I have (a pair of Vargellas) came through the Chicago Wine Company, a favorite site/auction house of mine to peruse as their site doesn't seem to trigger the work internet filters, haha. I've seen probably a case worth of odd '87s come through there over the past year, so worth keeping an eye on them. And wine-searcher pro, of course, if you're looking to stock up.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalkz. U
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalkz. U
Re: 1985 Fonseca
I've had quite a few of the 1987 Vargellas over the years. I had one prisine six pack in my London cellar that come over here two years ago. Chris Forbes visited from TFP a couple of months ago and I served one of these ... a bottle in perfect condition. I wish I could find more of these, as there are only 5 left in my cellar. But in the USA, this is one that is really not easy to find. Considering how relatively easy it is to find 1991 Vargellas, it is hard to understand.
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com