1970 Fonseca Vintage Port

This forum is for users to post their Port tasting notes.

Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil

Post Reply
Edward J
Posts: 301
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 9:30 am
Location: Bay Point, Ca, USA

1970 Fonseca Vintage Port

Post by Edward J »

First of four bottles, this one from Wine Bid. The bottle looked less than perfect and the fill was bottom neck. It was a prime candidate for our birthdays/35th anniversary weekend.

7 hour decant, and I think 9 might have been better. Cork was in decent shape with lots of sediment. Very dark right out of the bottle. The nose was a bit closed, but I picked up tobacco, anise perhaps? Complexity was fine, typical Fonseca profile, rich, sweet, and elegant. I picked up an Orange Dreamsicle on top of a graham cracker. The finish was long and hot. It seemed a bit detached and prevented a better score. This is a powerhouse of a wine. This bottle was enjoyable and very good, but I suspect not the best example of this. 91+ points
User avatar
Roy Hersh
Site Admin
Posts: 21427
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Sammamish, WA
Contact:

Re: 1970 Fonseca VP

Post by Roy Hersh »

How crazy that a 46 year old bottle of Port is too much when "only" decanted for 7 hours and would be likely better at 9?

But this is actually one of the top two Ports of the vintage, alongside the Nacional AND, imho, one of the finest VPs to be produced in the past half century. Sorry your first of four examples was not up to its typical greatness; that heat you experienced is usually not part of the profile I experience.
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Edward J
Posts: 301
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 9:30 am
Location: Bay Point, Ca, USA

Re: 1970 Fonseca VP

Post by Edward J »

This is the problem you encounter having to acquire your wines of sometimes questionable provenance. Looking back it was a gamble to buy that particular lot, but the price was right. So you pays your money and take your chances. No regrets.
User avatar
Andy Velebil
Posts: 16613
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 1970 Fonseca VP

Post by Andy Velebil »

Edward J wrote:This is the problem you encounter having to acquire your wines of sometimes questionable provenance. Looking back it was a gamble to buy that particular lot, but the price was right. So you pays your money and take your chances. No regrets.
The hard part of buying any old wine, Port or otherwise, is what happened to it during all those decades. Back then there wasn't much active cooled shipping going on and certainly not for wine, not a lot of air conditioning, and a lot of passive cellars that warmed up in the summer.
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Moses Botbol
Posts: 5923
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
Location: Boston, USA

Re: 1970 Fonseca VP

Post by Moses Botbol »

Roy Hersh wrote:How crazy that a 46 year old bottle of Port is too much when "only" decanted for 7 hours and would be likely better at 9?

But this is actually one of the top two Ports of the vintage, alongside the Nacional AND, imho, one of the finest VPs to be produced in the past half century.
I haven't had '70 Nacional, but Niepoort & Dow are also stunners for 2nd place tie.

Roy, do you think '85 Fonseca will surpass '70 in the long run? '85 is so dark and young, I can't imagine it ever being over the hill in our lifetime.
Welsh Corgis | F1 |British Cars
Post Reply