1966 Warre's Vintage Port

This forum is for users to post their Port tasting notes.

Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil

Post Reply
User avatar
Derek T.
Posts: 4080
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Chesterfield, United Kingdom - UK
Contact:

1966 Warre's Vintage Port

Post by Derek T. »

UK bottled by Peatling & Cowdry (embossed lead capsule) - I bought this bottle as part of a mixed lot of Dow's and Warre's 66 - no labels and the cellar tags became detached during shipping. I had this one down as a Dow's until I pulled the cork (intact) and found it was Warre's 1966.

Decanted cleanly with lots of dark crust stuck to the side of the bottle, despite being stood up for 3 days. Colour was remarkably dark for a 40 year old VP with no signs of browning. An attractive cherry nose whilst decanting but in the glass seemed very closed. Initial taste was very dry with some heat. Licorice taste fading to mint and then watering cheeks. Promising.

+8 Hours
Fabulous dark and very bright appearance. Nose still closed but revealing black cherry & licorice. Still very dry and the tanins dominate everything else.

+11 Hours
Stunning wine, tanins now integrating and masses of fruit coming through.

+14 Hours
Fragrant nose. Putting on weight and colour as each hour goes by. Tanins now fully integrated and wine shoing at it's best from 11 to 14 hours.

+60 Hours
Very smooth and elegant - black cherry and still very chewy - a magnificent wine.

I had this bottle over a 3 day period. It never faded away but was never as good as it was at 11 to 14 hours. One of the best VP's I have had.

Score 9-8
User avatar
Derek T.
Posts: 4080
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Chesterfield, United Kingdom - UK
Contact:

Post by Derek T. »

Has anyone had recent experience of this wine? - I enjoyed it so much I am thinking of finding more but would be interested to know if the bottle I had was exceptional compare to other bottlings.

All views on this wine would be most welcome.

Derek
Jay Powers
Posts: 527
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 10:48 pm
Location: Pacifica, California, United States of America - USA

Post by Jay Powers »

No I have not, but after your tasting note I'm certainly looking for one.

I recently had the 1970, which was fantastic and one of the best ports I have had. The 77 tasted side by side could not compare. So now I need to find the 66....better than the 70?

Jay
User avatar
Derek T.
Posts: 4080
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Chesterfield, United Kingdom - UK
Contact:

Post by Derek T. »

Jay,

I hope you find some of the 66 - not an expensive port considering the age and quality.

I can't comment on whether or not it is better than the 70 as I have not had it - yet!

Derek
Post Reply