1963 BURMESTER VINTAGE PORT

This forum is for users to post their Port tasting notes.

Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil

Post Reply
SEAN C.
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:17 pm
Location: Brooklyn,, New York, United States of America - USA

1963 BURMESTER VINTAGE PORT

Post by SEAN C. »

There was not enough time given to properly decant the 1963 Burmester and as a result it had a strong nose of alcohol mixed with a strange canned tomato smell. It was cloudy in the glass and brick red in color. There was a ton of acidity in the mouth and it initially tasted like sugary cotton candy and tart fruit. After several hours of decanting the Burmester did improve but still had citrus-like notes on the palate, perhaps due to the acidity. This was a decent '63 but hard to drink next to the 1948 Graham.
Sean C. 88/100
Moses B. 85/100
Image
User avatar
Andy Velebil
Posts: 16828
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 1963 BURMESTER VINTAGE PORT

Post by Andy Velebil »

Yeah, I could see how this bottle would have a hard time standing up next to the '48 Graham's :lol: Thanks for the notes Sean.
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Richard Henderson
Posts: 693
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:21 pm
Location: fort worth, Texas, United States of America - USA

Re: 1963 BURMESTER VINTAGE PORT

Post by Richard Henderson »

The 1963 Burmester was one of my first ports. In the late 80's a local shop had a lot of it for about $30-40.
I remember sailing a 20 feet Ensenada on Copano Bay near Rockport, Texas with my family , circa 1990 on a sunset sail on a beam reach drinking the 63 Burmester with Stilton , whole meal biscuits and walnuts. It was not a blockbuster wine and your 85-87 scores match my memory of it but it was a good 63 vp for the price.
Richard Henderson
Post Reply