2003 Quinta de Ventozelo LBV Port

This forum is for users to post their Port tasting notes.

Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil

Post Reply
*123

2003 Quinta de Ventozelo LBV Port

Post by *123 »

2003 Quinta de Ventozelo Porto Late Bottled Vintage 375 ml $13.99

89 points: On opening: a slightly green, grassy and red cherry nose, although the grass blew away in just a few minutes and the cherry turned dark. Still, a bit tight on opening. A little lighter in body than expected, good mix of black cherry with some yellow cherry and red raspberry undertones. Good balance, with the tannins mostly showing up at the end of the fairly long very red raspberry finish. Nice.

+ 120 minutes Still v tight but very cherry nose, and the raspberry undertones are a bit more pronounced upfront. The rest remains much the same

+ 300 minutes. Still stable but with a touch of chocolate in the finish. All together, a flavorful but not overly powerful port
User avatar
Roy Hersh
Site Admin
Posts: 21849
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Porto, PT
Contact:

Re: 2003 Quinta de Ventozelo Porto LBV

Post by Roy Hersh »

Terrance,

Here I thought we'd never see you again. Thanks for coming back and posting this tasting note. I like this producer and wish I could find their Ports more often. I am hoping you saved a few ounces for tomorrow as I'd love to hear how this showed when it had more air time. If possible, please let us know.

Welcome back!
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Todd Pettinger
Posts: 2022
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:59 am
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada

Re: 2003 Quinta de Ventozelo Porto LBV

Post by Todd Pettinger »

I just had the 1998 Ventozelo LBV yesterday and it was fantastic. It was similar in many aspects to what you describe here (I also got a somewhat grassy/vegetal note) and raspberry/cherry is bang on. My bottle, with the extra age seemed to be much more developed and mature than what you describe.

TN to come
Post Reply