Scotland, science experiment & wine ... do mix!

For things that don't fit into the other categories.

Moderators: Glenn E., Roy Hersh, Andy Velebil

Post Reply
User avatar
Roy Hersh
Site Admin
Posts: 21849
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Porto, PT
Contact:

Scotland, science experiment & wine ... do mix!

Post by Roy Hersh »

Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
User avatar
Derek T.
Posts: 4080
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Chesterfield, United Kingdom - UK
Contact:

Re: Scotland, science experiment & wine ... do mix!

Post by Derek T. »

"A variety of wines were included in the trial; ranging from a £3.49 bottle of Claret to a £29.99 bottle of Champagne."

I suppose it's all relative, but that doesn't seem to be a wide enough range to distinguish between "cheap" and "expensive" [shrug.gif]

A £3.49 bottle of Claret v a 1955 Pichon Baron en Magnum might have been a better test [dance2.gif]
User avatar
Derek T.
Posts: 4080
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Chesterfield, United Kingdom - UK
Contact:

Re: Scotland, science experiment & wine ... do mix!

Post by Derek T. »

Incidentally, anyone who can't tell the difference between Claret and Champagne, whether cheap or not, should perhaps stick to drinking beer [help.gif]
User avatar
Glenn E.
Posts: 8396
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:49 am
Location: Sammamish, Washington, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: Scotland, science experiment & wine ... do mix!

Post by Glenn E. »

Derek T. wrote:Incidentally, anyone who can't tell the difference between Claret and Champagne, whether cheap or not, should perhaps stick to drinking beer [help.gif]
And Budweiser at that. Leave the good stuff for the people who can taste it.
Glenn Elliott
User avatar
Glenn E.
Posts: 8396
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:49 am
Location: Sammamish, Washington, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: Scotland, science experiment & wine ... do mix!

Post by Glenn E. »

There is another explanation for the result, but it is one that the trade would not like.

Perhaps it is not the tasters who cannot tell the difference, but rather the wines themselves that aren't distinct.
Glenn Elliott
Post Reply