2000 Quinta de Roriz Vintage Port

This forum is for users to post their Port tasting notes.

Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil

Post Reply
User avatar
Andy Velebil
Posts: 16828
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

2000 Quinta de Roriz Vintage Port

Post by Andy Velebil »

Found on a wine list for $30 so I had to get it. Popped and poured but still has lovely loganberry and menthol nose. Moderate tannins on palate but getting stronger as it gets air. Plenty of fruit and a long smooth finish this is drinking nicely even without aeration. Hopefully I can save some for later to really get a good overall feel, but right now I'm.....
91 points
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
User avatar
Andy Velebil
Posts: 16828
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 2000 Quinta de Roriz Vintage Port

Post by Andy Velebil »

This later showed chocolate and mocha on the palate but held about the same overall score. This will make a very nice mid-term VP but this bottle just didn't have the overall body and structure showing to indicate a long life ahead of it. Score remains the same.
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
User avatar
Glenn E.
Posts: 8397
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:49 am
Location: Sammamish, Washington, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 2000 Quinta de Roriz Vintage Port

Post by Glenn E. »

The 1999 Quinta de Roriz is my "benchmark" Port that marks my boundary between 89 and 90 points. The brambleberries and chocolate sound familiar in your 2000.
Glenn Elliott
Russ K
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:55 am
Location: Denver, Colorado, United States of America - USA

Re: 2000 Quinta de Roriz Vintage Port

Post by Russ K »

good to hear I have a few of these (and some 2003's as well).
Russ
Post Reply