1937 Burmester Colheita Port

This forum is for users to post their Port tasting notes.

Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil

Post Reply
User avatar
Rune EG
Posts: 1265
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 11:03 am
Location: Drammen, Norway

1937 Burmester Colheita Port

Post by Rune EG »

Bottled 2010, so it means 73 years in oak! Relatively dark brown. Aroma in the beginning too much spirit, a little bitter and almonds. After 5.5 hrs decanting all the spirit and the bitterness had gone, and the aroma was more round and complex, actually a bit sweet. The taste was showing a balanced and pleasant port, round, nearly “fat” in style, caramel, medium body. Still a bit sharp, but in a refined way. Finish medium length. It is fun to drink such an old port, and the quality in my mind equals 91 pts
Last edited by Rune EG on Sat Oct 15, 2011 2:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Roy Hersh
Site Admin
Posts: 21849
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Porto, PT
Contact:

Re: 1937 Burmester Colheita

Post by Roy Hersh »

I would have guessed it was actually in wood for longer than that, Rune! [help.gif]

Given your last week's consumption, the 1937 actually looks like a youngster now, eh? [foilhat.gif]
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
User avatar
Rune EG
Posts: 1265
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 11:03 am
Location: Drammen, Norway

Re: 1937 Burmester Colheita

Post by Rune EG »

Hi Roy!
You gave me a good laugh now.
73 hours in oak is abt 3 days, so that will not impress anyone.
I think I will make a correction due to the Tasting Note Base.
Post Reply