I agree absolutely (although i am stuck on 720) - but unfortunately i have not found it to be a full substitute for a HDTV - the convenience of a tv (switch on, switch off, no need to fiddle with an AV receiver or screen, nor worry about bulb degredation through use for repeated short stints), and the desire to sometimes watch with a few lights on (or in bright daylight) or simply have the box on for back-ground ambience means that a TV is still a necessity in my house!Russ K wrote:get a 110 inch screen and a 1080p projector. you will not regret it!
My advice - you can spend hours agonising over specifications that magazine/internet reviews will make out to be huge differences. Use the reviews to avoid the dogs, but then see a few TVs in person and decide which picture you like (test on say, a football game, an action movie (action scenes in Transformers is what a lot of reviews used to use as their reference), and a scene with lots of darks/shadows - i had a couple of dvds to take with me into the shop).
When you find, as you inevitably will, that there is not much difference between many of the ones you are considering, go by which looks sexiest when turned off! LED/LCD progress has been amazing over the last few years in terms of cutting plasma's advantage for motion and deep blacks. Plus i like the extra brightness and lower bulk/thickness of LED/LCD, but that's personal (though i agree with Eric re: edge lit LEDs). There's an energy saving there too vs Plasma, but i doubt that it would amount to much in the way of VP over the course of a year! And if you do prefer plasma, i like Andrew have never experienced burn-in from static images - even on an old Panasonic and "first gen" Pioneer. Save 3D for your next purchase in 5 years time. Internet enabled for Netflix etc. is a bonus, but as others say, if you don't get it on your tv you can easily (and cheaply) get it via your other componentry.
oh - and if you have a spare weekend to spend browsing...avforums.com...