1985 Dows Vintage Port

This forum is for users to post their Port tasting notes.

Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil

Post Reply
User avatar
John M.
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Hunterdon County, New Jersey, USA

1985 Dows Vintage Port

Post by John M. »

From a 1/2 bottle. Decanted 8 hours; cork came out nicely--could have used a few more hours in decanter. Light brick red (lighter than the 83 tasted along side--the 83 looked more youthful). Nose offered crushed grass with a touch of spice. The taste had many different elements: touch of chocolate, a rather sweet and spicy quality. The finish was moderate and gave a strawberry candy finish. While very good, it seemed inferior to the 83.

92 Points
Any Port in a storm!
Moses Botbol
Posts: 6047
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
Location: Boston, USA

Re: 1985 Dows Vintage Port

Post by Moses Botbol »

John M. wrote: While very good, it seemed inferior to the 83.
Have never someone say that comparing the two. Usually it's the '85 that is held in higher regard. That being said, I have never had both side-by-side.
Welsh Corgis | F1 |British Cars
User avatar
John M.
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Hunterdon County, New Jersey, USA

Re: 1985 Dows Vintage Port

Post by John M. »

I got the bottles from WineBid within the last 6 months and reading between the lines I think the same source. Still, the assessment on the two as compared was universal (just four of us)--the 83 just seemed to shine.
Any Port in a storm!
Moses Botbol
Posts: 6047
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
Location: Boston, USA

Re: 1985 Dows Vintage Port

Post by Moses Botbol »

John M. wrote:I got the bottles from WineBid within the last 6 months and reading between the lines I think the same source. Still, the assessment on the two as compared was universal (just four of us)--the 83 just seemed to shine.
1983 Dow is a little harder to find the 1985, FWIW
Welsh Corgis | F1 |British Cars
Eric Menchen
Posts: 6687
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:48 pm
Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States of America - USA

Re: 1985 Dows Vintage Port

Post by Eric Menchen »

I like the '83 SW over the '85, and the same goes for my experience with Grahams. Checking my notes I've been underwhelmed by both of the Dows, but perhaps it is time to give the '83 another try.
User avatar
Roy Hersh
Site Admin
Posts: 21849
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Porto, PT
Contact:

Re: 1985 Dows Vintage Port

Post by Roy Hersh »

I like the Dow's 1983 and think the 1985 Dow's is every bit as good and likely the longer lasting of the two. The 1985 is still very immature given its age and a real bargain for the price.
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
User avatar
David Spriggs
Posts: 2658
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 9:51 pm
Location: Dana Point, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 1985 Dows Vintage Port

Post by David Spriggs »

I prefer the 1983 Dow to the 1985. Although I have had a few badly corked 1983 Dow's, most of them are just fine. I strongly prefer the 1985 Grahams over the 1983. I will say that the 1985 Grahams has been in a bit of a funk over the last few years, it does seem to be emerging nicely now. I will have to dig through and find my stash of 1985 Grahams and pop one. [cheers.gif] As for Smith Woodhouse, I prefer the 1985, but the 1983 is very good as well. I would be happy with either one! :lol:
Post Reply