Page 1 of 1

Andy Velebil in facebook ad

Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:08 pm
by Bert VD
Hey Andy, you're famous now :D

i just saw your Fonseca ad on facebook. well done [cheers.gif]

Re: Andy Velebil in facebook ad

Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2021 3:55 pm
by Eric Ifune
Was that an ad?

Re: Andy Velebil in facebook ad

Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2021 5:11 pm
by Andy Velebil
Thanks guys.

It’s not an ad. They’re doing videos of people talking about their favorite Fonseca VP. Axel Probst Has also done one.

Re: Andy Velebil in facebook ad

Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2021 10:31 am
by Bert VD
a brand that posts video's about their product sound like an ad to me. not that i think that's negative or something. i prefer this format over scripted marketing stuff :-)

Re: Andy Velebil in facebook ad

Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2021 2:02 pm
by Glenn E.
I can't find it... anyone have a link?

Re: Andy Velebil in facebook ad

Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2021 3:17 pm
by Andy Velebil
Glenn E. wrote:I can't find it... anyone have a link?
Check your FB messenger

Re: Andy Velebil in facebook ad

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:14 am
by Moses Botbol
1948 has been my favorite Fonseca vintage so far.

Re: Andy Velebil in facebook ad

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:54 am
by Glenn E.
Moses Botbol wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:14 am 1948 has been my favorite Fonseca vintage so far.
I really wanted to be amazed by the 1948 (and the 1948 Taylor), but neither of them has ever made me say "wow!"

Some day I hope to get to try the 1945 and/or the 1927, but I fear the chance of that happening diminishes every year.

'63, '66, '70, '77, and '85 are all pretty amazing. I think I rate the '66 and '70 a little higher than the other 3, and the choice between them for me likely comes down to "which one is easier to reach." :lol:

Re: Andy Velebil in facebook ad

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:31 pm
by Mike J. W.
Glenn E. wrote: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:54 am
Moses Botbol wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:14 am 1948 has been my favorite Fonseca vintage so far.
I really wanted to be amazed by the 1948 (and the 1948 Taylor), but neither of them has ever made me say "wow!"

Some day I hope to get to try the 1945 and/or the 1927, but I fear the chance of that happening diminishes every year.

'63, '66, '70, '77, and '85 are all pretty amazing. I think I rate the '66 and '70 a little higher than the other 3, and the choice between them for me likely comes down to "which one is easier to reach." :lol:
I've tried all of those last 5 that you listed except for the '63. I have 3 bottles of the '63 but I'm saving them for a special occasion. Of the remaining 4, the '66 in my opinion is far and away the best Fonseca that I've had.

I'm surprised that you didn't mention the '94. Too young for you or just not on the same plateau? For me, the '94 is better than the '70, '77 and '85, but not better than the '66...yet.

Re: Andy Velebil in facebook ad

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:31 pm
by Glenn E.
Mike J. W. wrote: Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:31 pm
Glenn E. wrote: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:54 am
Moses Botbol wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:14 am 1948 has been my favorite Fonseca vintage so far.
I really wanted to be amazed by the 1948 (and the 1948 Taylor), but neither of them has ever made me say "wow!"

Some day I hope to get to try the 1945 and/or the 1927, but I fear the chance of that happening diminishes every year.

'63, '66, '70, '77, and '85 are all pretty amazing. I think I rate the '66 and '70 a little higher than the other 3, and the choice between them for me likely comes down to "which one is easier to reach." :lol:
I've tried all of those last 5 that you listed except for the '63. I have 3 bottles of the '63 but I'm saving them for a special occasion. Of the remaining 4, the '66 in my opinion is far and away the best Fonseca that I've had.

I'm surprised that you didn't mention the '94. Too young for you or just not on the same plateau? For me, the '94 is better than the '70, '77 and '85, but not better than the '66...yet.
You guessed it - too young right now. I think it's difficult to predict exactly how a Port will evolve as it matures, so as good as the '94 is I'm not comfortable saying that it will evolve into something as good as the '66 or '70.

Honestly, the '85 is almost still too young. It seems to be right on the cusp of maturity at the moment - some bottles are lovely and seem "youthfully mature" while others are still big bruisers. But given what I've seen between the two types of bottles, if that's the direction it's headed then it's going to be a fantastic Port as it continues to mature.

Re: Andy Velebil in facebook ad

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 4:26 pm
by Mike J. W.
The '85 can be young. The '94 is as well, but they're both drinking beautifully right now. There's no doubt that both still have room to improve, that's why I have lots of both. The '85 can still be found relatively cheap, but the '94 has really jumped in price over the last 4 years.

Re: Andy Velebil in facebook ad

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:25 pm
by Moses Botbol
The last few '85 Fonseca's I had in the last year were in a weird place. Was a better tasting port 5+ years ago, but I expect that to turn around. Perhaps it's hitting a closed phase? Had a '60 Fonseca within the year that was quite respectable.

Re: Andy Velebil in facebook ad

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2021 3:25 pm
by Scheiny S
Glenn E. wrote: Sat Feb 20, 2021 2:02 pm I can't find it... anyone have a link?
I'd love to see it, too!