Page 1 of 1

1977 Gould Campbell Vintage Port

Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:27 pm
by Andy Velebil
I've had this particular VP on only two previous ocasions, one was recent and was only a quick glass without decanting. So I am very excited to give this a proper taste and evaluate if what I thought of it earlier was true or not. Here is the first 13 hours of TN's...more to come tomorrow, just to see how this holds up over a couple of days.

On Decanting;
Dark ruby red that is darker than most 30 year old Ports and there is no signs of fading at all. The nose was very tight but showed loganberries and some violets. The palate was also very tight and not giving much up in the way of fruit. There was a lot of drying tannins and good acidity though and the finish was long, but again tight. Very promising at this early stage.

+5 hours;
This has really darkened in the past 5 hours. The nose has some very beautifull violets, black cherries, and loganberries. Although the secondary notes of violet are just starting to show and the primary fruit can still be easily found. The palate is the same, with some primary plums, cedar, and a touch of heat that is still a little tight but starting to give a little. The finish is long but still not giving up much at the moment. If I'd have to guess blind I would swear this was a 1995 VP. At this stage I gave it a 93-94 points.

+13 hours;
If it was dark earlier, its really dark now. I've seen some 1998's and 1999's that aren't this dark. Hard to believe this year is its 30 year anniversary. The palate has finally started to strut its stuff and has vibrant red berries, violets, and those wonderful early secondary nuances (or floralness) that I love in older VP's. The acidity and tannins are in full swing and are not showing any signs of slowing. The finish is just awsome now, big, filling, and last for what seems like forever. 96-97 points.

Since the first time I've had this i've always thought this was the sleeper of the vintage and this bottle proves it. I'm glad I just recently stocked up on these because they will easliy last another 20+ years. A stunning bottle from a producer that rarely gets its just dues.

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:33 am
by Andy Velebil
+26 hours;

This was drinking so well last night that I had to force myself to save a couple of glasses for today, I just didn't want to put it down.

This is really holding about the same as my last note, so nothing additional to add. What I will say is, this is without question the sleeper of the vintage.

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 1:35 pm
by Roy Hersh
I agree with you about the Gould from '77, which I have always been fond of as you know. Provenance is everything and great bottles of this VP show that this deserved more attention early on. But the lack of the attention has kept prices in check, so who can complain. I know some that prefer the Smith Woodhouse to the Gould, but not me.

If I only had known that you had recently re-stocked these ... 8--)


BTW, what is going on here? Five TNs on 1977 VPs this week by different individuals. Jeez, there must be some type of plot to revisit 30 year old VPs before the end of the year! :lol:

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 9:54 pm
by Ted D
I've had it twice, and must admit that despite having no clue what loganberries resemble, had similar experiences except that I found fresh pear on the nose and finish, specifically very strong fresh Bosch pear. "Ripe yet firm pear, and very distinctive," read my notes

Do loganberries resemble pear maybe?