1966 Sandeman Vintage Port

This forum is for users to post their Port tasting notes.

Moderators: Glenn E., Andy Velebil

Post Reply
SEAN C.
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:17 pm
Location: Brooklyn,, New York, United States of America - USA

1966 Sandeman Vintage Port

Post by SEAN C. »

The 1966 Sandeman was surprisingly spicy and peppery in the mouth. This was followed by a cranberry taste, a bit of nutmeg and some mint. The color was a medium ruby in the glass with a orange edge and was much darker than most Sandeman's I have had from the 60's. The '66 Sandeman is not a blockbuster from the vintage but a good everyday drinker if it can be had at a decent price. I would not recommend aging this one for the "long haul".

Sean C. 92/100

Image
User avatar
Roy Hersh
Site Admin
Posts: 21849
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Porto, PT
Contact:

Re: 1966 SANDEMAN VINTAGE PORT

Post by Roy Hersh »

I have owned quite a few of these. They either showed nicely or some had a serious hot streak. A tale of two sides of the coin.
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Henrik Lilja
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:08 pm
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: 1966 Sandeman Vintage Port

Post by Henrik Lilja »

Had the 1966 Sandeman vintage port in june 2008 during a tasting in a private wineclub:
http://photos-c-9.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-a ... 4_7161.jpg

We also tasted 1966 vintage port from Croft and Dow.

The color was like a golden colheita - no "darkness" at all as Sean experienced. Very thin yellow-colored - almost totally transparent - with just a lillte tiny hint of "red edge". Seemed very fragile!
In the beginning we couldn't find any nose at all - and I mean NO NOSE AT ALL! Panic! But slowly the aromas developed in the glass. Not a block-buster monster nose - but a very fragile, delicate and sofisticated nose. And it was nice - surely a lot of pepper - but also orange-notes and confectionery. This was followed by a taste of almonds, sweet-orange, liquorice and just a hint of apricot. A bit tawny-like. Glad I didn't had this one blind - that would have been pretty! :help:

I would rate the Sandeman vintage port 1966 slighty better than Sean 93-94p. Compared with the Croft and Dow 1966 vintage port I prefer Croft.

Best regards
Henrik Lilja
Member of the The Danish Port Wine Club est. 1981
Best regards
Henrik Lilja
The Danish Port Wine Club est. 1981
Vicepresident
User avatar
Andy Velebil
Posts: 16828
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: 1966 Sandeman Vintage Port

Post by Andy Velebil »

having had a moderate number, but not a lot, of Sandeman VP's from the 1960's most have been at peak or just a little past their peak. Luckily some recent bottles showed amazing youth for Sandeman of their age. But I assume that is more the exception than the rule...someone with more experience with them will have to help out on that assumption.
Andy Velebil Good wine is a good familiar creature if it be well used. William Shakespeare http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Post Reply