Page 1 of 1

1967 Taylor Fladgate Quinta de Vargellas Vintage Port

Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:29 am
by Glenn E.
Another bottle from this weekend, so again no formal notes. Mostly what I remember is that it was really good and easily lasted (quality-wise) 3 days. This particular example was "late bottled" in Oporto in 1970 rather than the expected 1969.

1967 Quinta de Vargellas Vintage Port
Color: still fairly young looking, with plenty of red left.
Nose: I noticed some faint spice and black pepper, along with a good backbone of fruit. Not too much alcohol, though some was evident.
Palate: Yum! Plenty of life left here as the tannins are still decent. Nice mellow/ripe red fruits, though nothing in particular stood out to me. More of the black pepper and other faint spice, though not as much as I expected given the reputation of Taylor Fladgate. Something resembling chocolate, but darker and without the sweetness... possibly cocoa nibs?
Finish: Good length and pleasantly warming.

If this bottle is representative, then I think it could use another 10 years before reaching its peak. It's an excellent Port now, though: 94 points.

Re: 1967 Quinta de Vargellas Vintage Port

Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2009 10:50 am
by Roy Hersh
There are two impressions that are derived from this particular wine and I've had several of both sorts. One is as mentioned and is a beautifully integrated young and delicious bottling. The other is a "hot" and really spirity version that I've had several bottles of, all coming from an impeccable ex-cellars source. The former are truly outstanding VPs while the lesser bottles have so much heat they are a bit tough to truly appreciate the fruit.

Re: 1967 Quinta de Vargellas Vintage Port

Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:43 am
by Glenn E.
I wonder if the difference is between the 1969 and 1970 bottlings?

Re: 1967 Quinta de Vargellas Vintage Port

Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 12:50 pm
by Roy Hersh
That I can't answer.