Port and cold temperatures

This section is for those who have basics questions about, or are new to, Port. There are no "dumb" questions here - just those wanting to learn more!

Moderators: Glenn E., Roy Hersh, Andy Velebil

Moses Botbol
Posts: 6034
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:38 am
Location: Boston, USA

Re: Port and cold temperatures

Post by Moses Botbol »

Jeff G. wrote:i'm curious about the frozen port though

i've been very tempted to make some port gelato, and if what theodore says is true, I would never get it to solidify
If you could concentrate/reduce the port enough, when mixed with cream, milk and eggs, will be able to freeze. Getting enough port flavor to actually make a gelato will be the tough part.
Welsh Corgis | F1 |British Cars
User avatar
Glenn E.
Posts: 8380
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:49 am
Location: Sammamish, Washington, United States of America - USA
Contact:

Re: Port and cold temperatures

Post by Glenn E. »

Moses Botbol wrote:
Jeff G. wrote:i'm curious about the frozen port though

i've been very tempted to make some port gelato, and if what theodore says is true, I would never get it to solidify
If you could concentrate/reduce the port enough, when mixed with cream, milk and eggs, will be able to freeze. Getting enough port flavor to actually make a gelato will be the tough part.
Contrary to what Food Detectives on the Food Network tried to tell you, when you reduce an alcoholic liquid the alcohol content does in fact go down. Alcohol has a lower boiling point and a lower vapor pressure than water (very slightly) so if you reduce slowly the alcohol boils off first.

Now if you crank up the heat and boil it raucously, then both the water and the alcohol are boiling and you're not actually changing the ratio that much. It's changing a little bit because the alcohol evaporates more easily, but it's not a huge difference. That's probably what Food Detectives did in their "test" and so that's why they got a bogus result.

So just barely simmer your mixture and you'll lose most if not all of the alcohol, after which it should freeze just fine.
Glenn Elliott
Russ K
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:55 am
Location: Denver, Colorado, United States of America - USA

Re: Port and cold temperatures

Post by Russ K »

if you wanted, one could actually set up a little still with some lab scale equipment, and get the alcohol almost out completely. Quite a process for some ice cream tho...I would go with Glenn's method first!
I have had Jamaican Rum gelato once in Victoria BC, it was fab, so I am sure a port one is doable.
Jeff G.
Posts: 413
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 7:41 am
Location: NY, NY

Re: Port and cold temperatures

Post by Jeff G. »

Russ K wrote:if you wanted, one could actually set up a little still with some lab scale equipment, and get the alcohol almost out completely. Quite a process for some ice cream tho...I would go with Glenn's method first!
I have had Jamaican Rum gelato once in Victoria BC, it was fab, so I am sure a port one is doable.
you mean distill port?
Disclosure: Distributor for Quevedo Wines in NY
Russ K
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:55 am
Location: Denver, Colorado, United States of America - USA

Re: Port and cold temperatures

Post by Russ K »

absolutely...
you will lose some of the phenols / any lighter ended stuff with it, but you could do a cut of the C2H5OH out of the mostly H2O and heavier components port mixture, I would estimate a top condensing temp of around 353K (80F) you could basically reverse the brandy adding process (bizarro world), use a high reflux ratio and tada, port with almost all its water and little booze (some water will go with the C2H5OH becuase of the azeotrope). The port left would be lacking much aromatic value though,as anything lighter than C2H5OH would go with it...
Jeff G.
Posts: 413
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 7:41 am
Location: NY, NY

Re: Port and cold temperatures

Post by Jeff G. »

Russ K wrote:absolutely...
you will lose some of the phenols / any lighter ended stuff with it, but you could do a cut of the C2H5OH out of the mostly H2O and heavier components port mixture, I would estimate a top condensing temp of around 353K (80F) you could basically reverse the brandy adding process (bizarro world), use a high reflux ratio and tada, port with almost all its water and little booze (some water will go with the C2H5OH becuase of the azeotrope). The port left would be lacking much aromatic value though,as anything lighter than C2H5OH would go with it...
at least i could barrel age my own fire water.

tho i think it's illegal in the states ;-)
Disclosure: Distributor for Quevedo Wines in NY
User avatar
Roy Hersh
Site Admin
Posts: 21821
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Porto, PT
Contact:

Re: Port and cold temperatures

Post by Roy Hersh »

To simplify the chemistry lesson here:

Take your leftover Port and pour it into an ice cube tray(s), better if they're plastic and not metal trays.

insert into your freezer.

You've now accomplished the inclusion of both ends of the topic: Port & cold temperatures :scholar:

To reward thyself for this achievement, take said frozen Port-cubes and use them to enhance sauce and gravy recipes, or allow them to rethermalize and sip at your convenience. :wink:
Ambition driven by passion, rather than money, is as strong an elixir as is Port. http://www.fortheloveofport.com
Eric Menchen
Posts: 6674
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:48 pm
Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States of America - USA

Re: Port and cold temperatures

Post by Eric Menchen »

Glenn E. wrote: Contrary to what Food Detectives on the Food Network tried to tell you, when you reduce an alcoholic liquid the alcohol content does in fact go down. Alcohol has a lower boiling point and a lower vapor pressure than water (very slightly) so if you reduce slowly the alcohol boils off first. ... So just barely simmer your mixture and you'll lose most if not all of the alcohol, after which it should freeze just fine.
Instead of simmering, heat to just above 172 F to cook off the alcohol, and don't try to capture it to stay legal. (Adjust temperature slightly for altitude. 170 would probably work for me at 5000'.)
Post Reply