Page 1 of 2
September Virtual tasting Poll
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 9:12 pm
by Frederick Blais
So I think we are looking to taste a Vintage Port for this coming month. I like the idea of Tom to taste one from the 1991 vintage.
Now I want to know if you all want to taste the same or taste the one you want.
Gives your suggestion too for the chosen one!
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:13 am
by Andy Velebil
Fred,
i choose any VP of my choosing. The only reason is I can only locate the Dow's 1991 VP near me. as I have no '91s in my cellar. I still can't have wine shipped to me as it is near 100 degrees here in L.A. the past couple days.
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:07 pm
by John Conwell
I'd vote any 91 VP you of your choice, since it'll probably be hard for everyone to find the same producer.
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:51 am
by Derek T.
I voted for the personal choice as specific VP's are more difficult to find in single bottles than say a a Tawny or LBV.
However, we could all post a list of which 91's we each have to see if we can limit the scope of the VT to 1, 2 or 3 shippers to allow some comparisons of the same wines. For starters I have Graham's and Gould Campbell 91's. What does everyone else have in the cellar?
Derek
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:32 am
by Tom Archer
OK - Cockburn is my first choice, but I could also tackle Warre or Graham.
Tom
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:33 am
by Andy Velebil
All I can get is Dow's
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 5:26 pm
by Derek T.
If people are finding it difficult to locate 1991's could we open this up to include any VP from the 91/92 split declaration?
Derek
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 9:15 am
by Tom Archer
Two good years followed each other, but they were not that much alike...
Tom
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 3:59 pm
by Frederick Blais
I'd Focus on 91 so far no one spoke about problem getting one bottle. I'll probably go for Warre's.
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:52 am
by Al B.
I'm (temporarily) back in the loop and will try to take part in the next virtual tasting.
I've got Gould Campbell, Grahams, Niepoort, Vesuvio and Warre.
However, as an alternative to trying to concentrate on a handful of producers, we could go to the other extreme and try to cover as many producers as we can - get an idea of how the vintage as a whole is developing.
But I'll go with the flow.
Alex
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:40 am
by Derek T.
Alex seems to have come up with a suggestion that is better than either of mine so I would like to change my opinion (a rare occurence!) and vote for a 91 horizontal VT 8)
Derek
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:51 am
by Tom Archer
OK, so far the line-up is:
Andy - Dow
Me - Cockburn
Fred - Warre
Derek, Alex, which do you want to go for?
- Who else is in?
Tom
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:22 am
by Derek T.
I'll take Graham's
Derek
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:04 pm
by Derek T.
I also have a recent TN for Gould Campbell so could post 2 TN's to widen the coverage of shippers.
Derek
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:05 pm
by Jay Powers
I'll take Krohns VP, 1991.
Jay
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:43 am
by Al B.
In which case I will take the Vesuvio.....although I would be happy to switch to the Niepoort (or Gould Campbell) if someone else chooses to taste the Vesuvio.
Alex
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:56 am
by simon Lisle
I'll take the Noval
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:38 am
by Andy Velebil
This is shaping up to be a very good VT this month. I can't wait to read the reviews.
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:48 am
by Derek T.
So far we have...........
Dow's.............Andy
Cockburn's.....Tom
Graham's........Me
Jrohn..............Jay
Vesuvio..........Alex
Noval.............Simon
Warre............Fred
Gould Campbell - Me from a very recent note unless anyone else takes it
Is there anyone else out there with 91's sitting waiting to be tatsed?
Derek
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:06 am
by Thomas McColl
I have a half bottle of Pocas '91, and I might be able to write a line or two.
Thomas