Page 1 of 1

A Friendly Port

Posted: Thu May 12, 2016 8:04 am
by Glenn E.
Click-through age "verification" required to get to this article at Cigar World.

https://www.cigarworld.com/cw-magazine/a-friendly-port/

Re: A Friendly Port

Posted: Thu May 12, 2016 10:51 am
by John M.
He was going great until the "Vintage Character" thing. Still, maybe it will get some to try.

Re: A Friendly Port

Posted: Thu May 12, 2016 11:05 am
by Michael T
DELETED

Re: A Friendly Port

Posted: Thu May 12, 2016 11:26 am
by Glenn E.
Michael T wrote:
John M. wrote:He was going great until the "Vintage Character" thing. Still, maybe it will get some to try.
I had never heard the Vintage Character designation but after doing some Googleing I found that name is quite common for Ruby and Reserve ports.
Isn't that the old name for Ruby Reserve? A little surprising that a new article would use the old name, though.

Re: A Friendly Port

Posted: Thu May 12, 2016 11:47 am
by Mario Ferreira
Michael T wrote:
John M. wrote:He was going great until the "Vintage Character" thing. Still, maybe it will get some to try.
I had never heard the Vintage Character designation but after doing some Googleing I found that name is quite common for Ruby and Reserve ports.
If I'm not mistaken, "Vintage Character" is nowadays out of use but at one point in the past it was used to designate the "Rubys Reserve". :twocents:

Re: A Friendly Port

Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 6:23 am
by Andy Velebil
Mario Ferreira wrote:
Michael T wrote:
John M. wrote:He was going great until the "Vintage Character" thing. Still, maybe it will get some to try.
I had never heard the Vintage Character designation but after doing some Googleing I found that name is quite common for Ruby and Reserve ports.
If I'm not mistaken, "Vintage Character" is nowadays out of use but at one point in the past it was used to designate the "Rubys Reserve". :twocents:
To my knowledge it is out of use now.

Re: A Friendly Port

Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 6:28 am
by Michael T
deleted

Re: A Friendly Port

Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 5:53 am
by Stewart T.
Correct. Vintage Character isn't used anymore. The IDVP prohibited the use of the term starting in 2002. "Reserve" is used now.

Re: A Friendly Port

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 11:25 pm
by james boyd
Stewart T. wrote:Correct. Vintage Character isn't used anymore. The IDVP prohibited the use of the term starting in 2002. "Reserve" is used now.
That's what I thought too. I think it was better to call it as it actually is.

Re: A Friendly Port

Posted: Sun May 29, 2016 11:57 pm
by Mika H
Here's the "Vintage Character" again. And this time "Quinta" too. The article is from last week:
http://www.cltampa.com/food-drink/drink ... the-better

Re: A Friendly Port

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 3:47 am
by Mario Ferreira
Mika H wrote:Here's the "Vintage Character" again. And this time "Quinta" too. The article is from last week:
http://www.cltampa.com/food-drink/drink ... the-better
Likely the author has based his research on outdated books !?

Re: A Friendly Port

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 10:30 am
by Scheiny S
i also thought it was odd that none of the Ports in the picture next to "Vintage Character" were that style. at least he listed names.
and he didn't mention that Tawnies get their color from aging in wood while rubies stay red because they age in the bottle.

Re: A Friendly Port

Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2016 5:09 pm
by Roy Hersh
The regulation changed along with a few other categories of Port, where the nomenclature of those categories was changed shortly after the IVP turned into the IVDP to include Douro wine regulations, in 2003, but the IVDP changed category names in 2005.