20 Year Old Tawny Port by Taylor Fladgate
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:01 am
I tried a Taylor 20 year old Tawny yesterday..
I know.. I know..
But having tried a VP and an LBV I thought I should follow through and try the Tawny as well..
I guess I could be really hardcore and try a Ruby as well, but... No...
I'll get to the TN, but I would like to say this first:
It IS exactly as has been mentioned on this forum before..
1st place:
VP's, It REALLY is a case of "you get what you pay for"..
Close 2nd:
LBV's: The poor man's VP. The one I tried, the Smith Woodhouse '94, was similar in taste and overall characteristics (ie. improved with extended decanting).
So if you want a Port on the cheap, this is the one (one of them, anyways..)
Not as delectable as a VP, but close.
3rd:
The Tawny. Not BAD, but not good.
If you are going to spend $70 Cdn, for God's sake spend it on a VP, or buy 2 botles of LBV!!!
The Taylor that I tried had rough edges right out of the bottle, and MOST IMPORTANTLY (in my mind), did not get any better with time..
An inferior Port, clearly..
NOW..
Should I draw these conclusions on the basis of these 3 Ports?
Definately not..
But when there's smoke there's fire, I always say..
And when you're spending not less that $30 per bottle..
Go with your gut, I say..
As I mentioned, I had a good idea going in what the results of this experiment would be, based on what I'd read here and elsewhere..
But you never REALLY know the hows and the whys until you try them yourself..
Here's that inadequate TN of the Taylor 20 year old Tawny:
Colour:
Quite a bit lighter than I was expecting.. Like weak orange pekoe tea.. A LIGHT brownish orange.
Nose:
On first opening, powerfully alcohalic, very pungent.. And like the 3 other Ports I tried, the aroma reminded me of apples..
After a 12 hour decant the alcohal was not as prominant, but still VERY hot!
Taste (served at room temperature):
Right out of the bottle, very hot on the attack right on through..
Hard to appreciate the flavour of the Port when your your mouth is "burning" like this..
So I left it for 12 hours..
After that span I was dissapointed to learn it had not improved as had the VP and LBV I had tried..
It was sweet, but still that vaguely unpleasant acidity and heat on the attack on through that had all but dissapeared at this point with the LBV and VP..
Still good drinking, still gets the job done..
But if you're going to spend this kind of money, put it towards a VP, or 2 bottles of LBV.
I look forward to hearing any and all comments you'd care to share on the subject!
I know.. I know..
But having tried a VP and an LBV I thought I should follow through and try the Tawny as well..
I guess I could be really hardcore and try a Ruby as well, but... No...
I'll get to the TN, but I would like to say this first:
It IS exactly as has been mentioned on this forum before..
1st place:
VP's, It REALLY is a case of "you get what you pay for"..
Close 2nd:
LBV's: The poor man's VP. The one I tried, the Smith Woodhouse '94, was similar in taste and overall characteristics (ie. improved with extended decanting).
So if you want a Port on the cheap, this is the one (one of them, anyways..)
Not as delectable as a VP, but close.
3rd:
The Tawny. Not BAD, but not good.
If you are going to spend $70 Cdn, for God's sake spend it on a VP, or buy 2 botles of LBV!!!
The Taylor that I tried had rough edges right out of the bottle, and MOST IMPORTANTLY (in my mind), did not get any better with time..
An inferior Port, clearly..
NOW..
Should I draw these conclusions on the basis of these 3 Ports?
Definately not..
But when there's smoke there's fire, I always say..
And when you're spending not less that $30 per bottle..
Go with your gut, I say..
As I mentioned, I had a good idea going in what the results of this experiment would be, based on what I'd read here and elsewhere..
But you never REALLY know the hows and the whys until you try them yourself..
Here's that inadequate TN of the Taylor 20 year old Tawny:
Colour:
Quite a bit lighter than I was expecting.. Like weak orange pekoe tea.. A LIGHT brownish orange.
Nose:
On first opening, powerfully alcohalic, very pungent.. And like the 3 other Ports I tried, the aroma reminded me of apples..
After a 12 hour decant the alcohal was not as prominant, but still VERY hot!
Taste (served at room temperature):
Right out of the bottle, very hot on the attack right on through..
Hard to appreciate the flavour of the Port when your your mouth is "burning" like this..
So I left it for 12 hours..
After that span I was dissapointed to learn it had not improved as had the VP and LBV I had tried..
It was sweet, but still that vaguely unpleasant acidity and heat on the attack on through that had all but dissapeared at this point with the LBV and VP..
Still good drinking, still gets the job done..
But if you're going to spend this kind of money, put it towards a VP, or 2 bottles of LBV.
I look forward to hearing any and all comments you'd care to share on the subject!